|
“The writing standards tell teachers where their students should end up. But what teachers need is a road map that tells them how to get there.” - Judith Hochman & Natalie Wexler (The Writing Revolution)
**A quick note about this newsletter. I use one standard as an example to unpack this process. If you would like more examples, please reply to this email with specific requests.** Your work matters.In some of my recent support of schools, I’ve been reflecting A LOT on how we can both provide standards-aligned instruction AND instruction that develops proficient readers. Because I’m finding that sometimes, those two things are not synonymous. As I shared in September’s newsletter, “I’m not sure the standards alone will suffice.” In fact, Sue Pimentel, one of the original authors of the Common Core State standards shared in December 2023: “Standards are not curriculum. And yet, far too many ELA curricula in use today have put them at the center of literacy instruction, with disappointing results.” It is difficult to ignore standards in schools. These standards outline the expected outcomes from our states and are specifically measured in our states’ high stakes assessments. For many schools, standards-driven instruction feels like the only way forward. But, what if we could layer these together and consider what a reader must do to demonstrate the standard? Might this be the approach that allows for the BOTH/AND I’ve been reflecting on? Many of the resources touting standards-alignment especially during this season of “test-prep” are simply grade level passages with questions designed to test a student’s ability to demonstrate the standard. Leaning on these resources, many teachers desperately seek another passage for RL 3.1 (and all the other ‘power standards’, i.e. those tested standards). I keep asking what are we DOING with these passages? Because… Reading directions is not teaching. Handing students a passage is not teaching. Working on how to answer a question might include some teaching, but does it teach a student to read? I propose considering the standards as the expected outcomes of proficient reading. Using the following sentence frame can help: “A proficient [insert grade] grade reader can [insert language of the standard].” Let’s try it. A proficient third grade reader can ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text, referring explicitly to the text as the basis for answers. (RL 3.1) When we reframe the language of the standard this way, we position proficient reading as also important, allowing us room to unpack the reading instruction necessary to develop proficient reading (hello The Reading Rope strands). In the Reading Rope, Hollis Scarborough (2001) highlighted the skills for developing proficient reading. Knowing this, we can determine how to support students with reading a text and then demonstrating their comprehension for RL 3.1 even in a scenario where teachers are pulling passages in response to assessment data highlighting standards in need of re-teach. 🔗 Decoding and Vocabulary Work - Chances are, there are multisyllabic words in the grade level passage being used. This presents teachers with an opportunity to teach students how to flexibly break words into syllables and identify morphemes to support students with decoding and understanding unknown words. 🔗 Sight Recognition and Fluency - “Every word wants to be a sight word.” We want our readers to increase their automaticity with word recognition and develop their fluency; reading with expression, accuracy and the appropriate rate. There are opportunities to support a readers’ fluency using passages and going beyond repeated readings. Teachers can discuss grammar structures, punctuation, and even dialogue marks used to teach how the author is guiding us to read the text. 🔗 Background Knowledge - Background knowledge is what we bring to a text, sometimes making it difficult to work on with students, especially when we are using a new unrelated passage each day. There is an opportunity to use passages in text sets that combine related knowledge, essentially building a student’s background knowledge while working through the passage. This also maximizes the time teachers spend on sharing some background knowledge about a topic with students. 🔗 Literary Knowledge and Language Structures - There is an opportunity to teach students how to identify the type of text and therefore the text structures used within the text. In addition, complex sentences within a text can be pulled out for teaching syntax, or the arrangement of words in a phrase or sentence, as well as morphemes and understanding the words and phrases used to develop sentence-level comprehension. Sentence-level comprehension can also be taught using the questions related to the passage. 🔗 Verbal Reasoning - Through discussion of a text, teachers have the opportunity to problem-solve around a text with students. This is more than simply teaching about making an inference using a formula. Teaching students to think deeply about a text and how to identify areas where the author intentionally leaves out information gets more to the heart of what our standards ask of our students. This is when a teacher might focus on asking and answering questions about the text, using evidence to support answers. Following the ideas of Placing Text at the Center of the Standards-Aligned ELA Classroom, (Liben & Pimentel) might we place the passage at the center of our instruction to design our plan for supporting reading development and aligning to the standards? I think this is possible if we consider The Reading Rope during our planning. Below, I’ve outlined some questions to help guide our planning.
You may notice, I’ve combined some of these into five sections of questions. It is possible that with this type of deep work that one (or two) passages can cover a week of instruction. In addition, if you are working with strong decoders, you may not need to spend time on the word recognition strands. (See Knowing Our Readers, November 2023 newsletter) By reframing how we see the standards (as outcomes) we allow instruction to focus on growing our readers. And isn’t that one reason why we are in the business of education? Leadership Moves:
What does this mean for me? Leaders have the ability to guide the focus for instruction. If all of your conversations are centered around the standards and end of year tests, you might not be leaving room for conversations about reading instruction. Reframe your thinking about the standards as outcomes of proficient reading. Revolution Resources"This is like a universal screener for a system." (System assessment reviewer) Join me on April 30th for the next free workshop, Assessing Your Literacy System!
Where have we been?Let's Work TogetherYour school or school system has unique challenges, strengths and needs - and your strategy deserves to be tailored to your specific context and goals. Gaining clarity on your system’s current picture can help write next year’s story. If literacy or coaching is part of your strategic plan or goals, let’s work together to identify highlights, considerations and opportunities that inform priorities for 2024-2025. Simply reply to this email to share your interest in more information and we can discuss your goals. Expanded Services: One on one support for school leadersWhen we are in a state of overwhelm, it is hard to drag ourselves out, especially on our own. It doesn't have to be that way. Working with a coach can...
Learn more about our services for leaders by visiting https://bit.ly/LeadersDeserveCare. "Self-care is the most underrated leadership skill." - Joy Donnell
| Where can we connect?Bold font shows events at which I'm presenting. NC CEC 40th Annual Conference | Learn more here 55th Annual North Carolina Reading Conference | Learn more here IMA Biennial Conference 2026 | Learn more here 2026 PaTTAN Literacy Symposium | Learn more here Get Engaged Coaching & Leadership Con 2026 | Learn more here
Would you like me to join an upcoming event as a speaker? Please reply to this email to inquire about how I can support you and your event.
|
I'm glad you're here. The only way to grow a revolution is by expanding our reach. And we cannot leave the reading revolution to chance. Our children need us.
“For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.”- H. L. Mencken Your work matters. Across the nation, states have passed legislation that requires teacher training and high quality instructional materials, often from a list. In last month’s newsletter, I highlighted the knowing-doing gap in response to this legislation. It’s clear that we need more than increased teacher knowledge and access to curriculum that aligns with the Science of Reading: Excel in Ed’s...
“It is not enough to have knowledge; one must apply it. It is not enough to have wishes; one must also accomplish them.” - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe Your work matters. A saying that we lean on in the Science of Reading movement is "know better, do better" a shortened version of Maya Angelou's “Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better.” And yes, for many educators this accurately describes an important step in their SoR journey: building knowledge about...
A note from Linda: I am seeking to meet with leaders for feedback on The Coaching System Growth Model, a transformative plan for improving coaching systems I’ve developed. If you’d like to participate, please reply or schedule a time here. “The expert at anything was once a beginner.” - Helen Hayes Your work matters. Last month, I finally met David and Meredith Liben in person after knowing them for years. I’ve been lucky to work with them on their Improving Reading for Older Students course...