"Systems thinking is a discipline for seeing wholes. It is a framework for seeing interrelationships rather than things, for seeing 'patterns of change' rather than static snapshots." - Peter Senge

Your work matters.

Sometimes the problem with what you built is how it’s being used.

Over the last few months, I’ve written about the gap between training and implementation and the importance of coaching in helping teachers move beyond the script.

There is more to this; I’ve been describing symptoms of the challenge - the interrelationship of your system.

Our systems are often the problem. Individual parts of our systems are not inherently flawed: we have invested in the right training, purchased the right curricular resources, implemented WIN time, and hired a coach; but when leaders ignore how the parts function together within the whole, even strong components can begin working against each other instead of supporting one another.

More importantly, when we forget that the people we serve are part of the system, we fail to account for the most essential variable of all.

Systems don’t operate independently. People operate systems and operate the work within them.

People bring variability, expertise gaps, competing demands, emotions, strengths, constraints, and instructional nuance that require systems to adapt in responsive ways. What if the system that worked three years ago needs to shift because of the people within it?

That adjustment work is leadership work.

The System Was the Problem

Recently, I was supporting teachers during their “What I Need” (WIN) time, a protected intervention block intended to provide targeted support for students.

Individually, many parts of the structure made sense:

• intervention time was protected
• students were grouped for support
• teachers were reteaching skills
• resources existed for intervention

But the parts were not working together effectively.

☑️Students were moving across classrooms.
✖️Teachers were reteaching the same lesson repeatedly in multiple small groups.
✖️Transitions consumed instructional minutes.
✖️Planning focused on activities for independent stations.

And perhaps most importantly:
The system assumed a level of teacher expertise and instructional capacity that did not yet exist consistently across the team.

The issue wasn’t simply the intervention block itself.

The issue was that the system had been designed without enough consideration for how the people, time, instruction, and structures interacted with one another in practice.

Systems Thinking Requires Human Thinking

One of the greatest misconceptions about systems work is the idea that tighter structures automatically produce better implementation.

But systems are only effective when the humans inside them can use them well.

In this case, many of the teachers were newer educators still building instructional knowledge and confidence. The complexity of the intervention structure increased cognitive load instead of supporting effective teaching.

So we adjusted, because the existing system was not responsive to the actual people implementing it.

Instead of maximizing movement and multiple reteaching groups, we simplified the structure and focused on targeted instruction aligned to shared student needs. The team already had the structure for a Walk to Read model: students were grouped based on their skill gaps.

Rather than teaching the same lesson in small groups repeatedly, we switched to a whole group lesson structure using a repeatable lesson routine, maximizing the instructional time and lowering the cognitive load for everyone.

And almost immediately:

• transitions decreased
• instructional time increased
• planning became more manageable
• teachers were more responsive during lessons
• students had greater access to instruction

The shift created coherence between the structure and the people within it.

Efficiency Is Not the Same as Effectiveness

In education, we sometimes mistake complexity for rigor.

More groups.
More rotations.
More structures.
More moving pieces.

But systems become inefficient when leaders focus on individual components without considering how those components interact collectively.

A strong intervention block paired with weak planning structures will struggle.

A high-quality curriculum without responsive coaching will struggle.

Protected instructional time with inefficient routines will struggle.

The problem is rarely one isolated piece. It’s the interaction between the pieces AND the people working the system.

That’s systems thinking that honors the people within it.

Instructional Time Is a Systems Issue

Instructional time is one of the most under-leveraged resources in schools—not because people don’t care about it, but because inefficiencies compound across the system.

A complicated grouping structure.
Unclear decision-making processes.
Planning meetings focused on logistics instead of instructional moves.
Resources disconnected from teacher expertise.

Individually, they seem manageable.

Together, they reduce the quality of instruction students receive. And they increase the burden on teachers trying to make the system work every day.

The Hidden Leadership Work

Strong leadership is about more than simply building systems. It is about studying how systems function for the people inside them.

That means leaders must continuously ask:

• Are our structures coherent?
• Do our systems align with actual teacher capacity?
• Are the parts working together or competing with one another?
• What friction points are reducing instructional impact?
• Have we designed this system around people—or around compliance?

The system you designed last year may not be an exact match for the people you will be serving next year.

Because when we forget that students, teachers, coaches, and leaders are all part of the system, we risk optimizing structures while unintentionally exhausting the humans responsible for carrying them out.

And no literacy initiative succeeds without people.

The Bigger Picture

The strongest literacy systems are not the ones with the most structures.

They are the ones where the structures, people, time, and instructional goals work together coherently.

Systems matter deeply.

But systems thinking requires us to see the full picture:
the curriculum,
the coaching,
the instructional time,
the leadership decisions,
the teacher expertise,
and the human experience inside all of it.

Because implementation improves when systems are designed not just to exist…

but to function effectively for the people within them.

As You Reflect This Month…

Where are the parts of your system unintentionally working against one another?

And have you designed your structures in a way that truly accounts for the people responsible for making them work?

Leadership Moves

1. Examine How the Parts of Your System Interact: Look beyond individual initiatives and evaluate how instructional time, planning, intervention structures, coaching, and curriculum work together—or unintentionally compete with one another.
2. Design Systems Around Human Capacity, Not Ideal Conditions: Consider the actual experience and expertise of the teachers implementing the work. Simplify structures when complexity increases cognitive load or reduces instructional responsiveness.
3. Audit for Instructional Efficiency: Study where instructional minutes are being lost through transitions, logistics, fragmented grouping structures, or unclear processes, and make adjustments that maximize meaningful teaching time.​

What Does This Mean for Me?

As a literacy leader, this means your focus is on ensuring the parts of your system work together coherently for the people responsible for implementation. Intervention blocks, curriculum resources, planning structures, and coaching supports cannot operate in isolation. Their effectiveness depends on how well they align with teacher capacity, instructional priorities, and student needs. This requires leaders to think systemically and humanely at the same time: studying where friction exists, recognizing when complexity is reducing effectiveness, and adjusting structures so they support the educators (and students) within them.

Column one Download the assessment

Column two Download the assessment

It’s the time of year that leaders are thinking about budgets and strategy for next year. I know literacy leadership can feel lonely - I’d love to support you with a plan for next year’s strategy. I am offering complimentary 30-minute strategy sessions; let's create a gameplan for next year! Book a call below.

Where have we been?

I had the joy of attending the International Mentoring Association Bienneial conference in St. Petersburg Florida. It was my first time, but certainly won’t be my last! ​ ​ ​This community of mentors genuinely just wants people to be their best selves and I am HERE for it! One of my biggest takeaways was that our instructional coaching community has much to learn from the mentoring world and the evidence-based practices used. There is much research there to explore. ​ How might our coaching practices shift if we leaned on principles of mentoring? ​ Thank you to Carol Pelletier Radford for the nudge and mentorship to submit a proposal to this conference! Without your guidance I would have missed out on this opportunity. ​ I was honored to share both a Trend Talk and Poster Session focused on personalized mentoring support. And y’all, I won the Fran Kochan Best Poster Presentation award! 😱🎉📚 ​ ​If you would like a copy of my poster, please reach out. I made mini postcards I can send you!

Grab my ebook! The Coaching System Assessment Guide: Identifying Strengths and Opportunities builds on the Coaching System Assessment, taking you beyong the assessment as you dig deeper into four key pillars: People, Process, Product, and Culture. If you’re ready to strengthen your coaching system in a way that truly supports educators and improves outcomes for students, this resource is for you. As a thank you for subscribing to my newsletter, please enjoy 20% off using the code: NEWSLETTER Buy the book

Where can we connect? Bold font shows events at which I'm presenting. IMA Biennial Conference 2026 | Learn more here​ 2026 PaTTAN Literacy Symposium | Learn more here​ The Reading League 10th Annual Conference | Learn more here​ Check out my calendar Would you like me to join an upcoming event as a speaker? Please reply to this email to inquire about how I can support you and your event.

​​Let's Work Together!

At Linda Rhyne Consulting, we help schools and districts strengthen their instructional coaching and literacy systems so every educator thrives so they can impact student outcomes. From assessing your current approach, to designing strategic plans, and partnering with leaders for long-term implementation, we make sure your systems align with research, state standards, and your unique context. If you’re ready for cohesive, sustainable systems that work for your people, let’s talk.

I'd love the chance to work with you/your team. Book a call today and let’s start designing the support your team deserves.