Comprehension is ”the orchestrated product of a set of linguistic and cognitive processes.”- Castles et. al Your work matters.For the longest time, I thought teaching comprehension was a bit of a mystery. We worked together to make sense of the text, yes, but not much more than that. The more I’ve learned, the more I understand that there was much more I could be doing to help my students than teaching them to find the main idea. It’s true, comprehension instruction is complex, but it doesn’t have to be a mystery. Something I was missing in my former approach was an understanding that my level of comprehension in texts was due to my level of language understanding - there were specific reasons I could comprehend the texts we read in class, but I couldn’t name them. I have a better grasp on that now. This summer, The Reading League North Carolina studied Nancy Hennessy’s Reading Comprehension Blueprint. This “textbook” dives deep into what the research supports for comprehension instruction and the concepts in it provide the pillars of LETRS Volume 2. I also read The Reading Comprehension Blueprint Activity Book, Nancy Hennessy and Julia Salamone’s new companion to The Reading Comprehension Blueprint and anchor text for the work I’m supporting in Plymouth-Canton Community Schools. In addition, I read David and Meredith Liben’s Know Better Do Better: Comprehension. In the midst of all of this studying, I revisited the publication Placing Textsat the Center and the Melissa and Lori Love Literacy podcast episode with Sue Pimentel and Meredith Liben that has the same title. All of these texts have a throughline - it's centering the text in our comprehension work. There is a reason for this. As I explained in July’s newsletter, some skills cannot be taught or practiced without a text. Which means the text influences the comprehension skills we teach and influences our comprehension: “Each text is essentially a frozen kaleidoscope, presenting its own combination of features and its own unique degree of challenge.” (Liben & Liben, 2024) When we try to keep centering standards or strategies in our planning process we continue to make comprehension instruction confusing for teachers and students. In The Reading Comprehension Blueprint, Nancy Hennessy goes deep into how to address comprehension. She describes the blueprint as exactly that - a guide for how we can begin to analyze texts to determine what we need to teach: “it is intended to organize and scaffold the teacher’s preparation of varied texts for varied purposes.” (p. 43) After selecting a text, teachers use the questions in the blueprint to determine the complexities within and begin to design instruction. The sections of The Blueprint cover Vocabulary, Language Structures, Knowledge, Levels of Understanding and Inference, and Expression of Understanding. Do these sections sound familiar? They should; the image below shows the connection between The Blueprint and Scarborough’s Reading Rope (2001), specifically addressing the Language Comprehension strands. Previously, I tried to support students in developing their comprehension. I spent time on vocabulary, discussed context clues, types of text structures and making inferences. But I’m learning that my instruction didn’t go deep enough. Even my making inferences instruction lacked clarity - I would find myself saying “You need to add what you know to what the text says.” While this is true, there is SO MUCH MORE I could be teaching my students. I lacked knowledge about local coherence in text and why it is important to pay attention to cohesive ties and connectives in texts to support inferring. I didn’t consider the importance of syntax or pronoun referents to comprehension. As a good comprehender, I didn’t know that my brain was making sense of all these features of the text to come away with understanding, and I didn’t have a guide or the knowledge to support my instruction differently - I was leaning on what I knew. If I could go back and do it again, I would plan differently (and hopefully with a curriculum in hand). I would begin with the texts included in our units of instruction, reading them with the lens of The Blueprint questions, looking for those strands of the rope in the text that would present challenge and possible need for instruction. I would check the lessons included in my curriculum, then I would reference The Reading Comprehension Blueprint Activity Book to support my lesson design or fill in any instructional gaps. I would deepen my knowledge of syntax, sentence comprehension, text structures, and the micro/macro structures within text, practicing identifying these as I read to better pay attention to those factors contributing to my comprehension. And if I were leading literacy in a school-building again, I would leave room for this work during planning. Clear comprehension instruction is possible once we understand the clues the text provides. Leadership Moves:
What does this mean for me?David and Meredith Liben say it better than me: “Our primary goal should be helping students to understand texts and to express that understanding in insightful discussions and writing. If students don’t understand the text, they cannot address standards-based questions, either in instruction or assessment. If they can comprehend grade-level texts, they stand a much better chance of attaining annual standards of achievement.” An important takeaway from this work is that planning with a standards-first approach often encourages a focus on strategies we think are applicable to all texts but that in reality are not. Instead, starting with the text at the center of planning leaves room for instruction of many standards in a way that makes sense. Let’s leave room for that in our literacy planning. Revolution ResourcesThe Reading Comprehension Blueprint Book Study videos from TRL-VT The Reading Comprehension Blueprint Book study Padlet from TRL-PA "This is like a universal screener for a system." (System assessment reviewer)
**Note, the September 30th session is cancelled. A recording will be sent to registered participants. Where have we been?Let's Work TogetherI'm thrilled to be working with some new districts and continue with current clients in the upcoming year! Having the opportunity to expand my reach and continue this work brings me so much joy. I have the capacity to offer professional development opportunities or smaller scale ongoing work next year. If literacy or coaching is part of your strategic plan or goals, let’s work together to design tailored support for Spring 2025 or the 2025-2026 school year. Click here to sync our calendars for a conversation. One on one support for school leadersMojdeh Harlan is moving into a new principal role at Smithfield Elementary in Charlotte, NC. She is living the phrase "walk the talk." Learn more about our services for leaders at this link. Mojdeh meets with each applicant for a "gain clarity" call that allows you the space to share your needs. Apply now to set up this call. "School leaders deserve a safe and confidential space to maximize their success."
- Mojdeh Harlan, Leadership Mentor and Coach
| Where can we connect?Bold font shows events at which I'm presenting. 7/9 - 7/10 - Get Engaged Coaching Con | Learn more here 7/16, 7/23, 7/30 - Chapter Network Summer Book Study | Learn more here 7/28 - Text Talk: Coaching Heavy, Coaching Light | Register here 10/8 - 10/10 The Reading League 9th Annual Conference | Learn more here
|
I'm glad you're here. The only way to grow a revolution is by expanding our reach. And we cannot leave the reading revolution to chance. Our children need us.
“There's decades of research that has shown a particular score [on a test] doesn’t predict what a student can do really well at all [due to the nature of how tests are designed].” - Dr. Matt Burns Your Work Matters Earlier this month, I attended a webinar with Dr. Matt Burns, hosted by TRL-VA and other chapters in our chapter network. This event began with a focus on understanding NAEP scores and then invited us to consider other forms of assessment that help inform our classroom instruction....
“The role of the default parent (read: educator) includes significant emotional burden. The constant availability (or perceived availability) and perpetual need can be draining overtime and can lead to feeling overwhelmed.” “Are you the default parent? If you have to think about it, you're not. You'd know. Trust me.” - M. Blazoned (Huff Post, 2014) Your Work Matters I began thinking about default “parents” in education recently after seeing a Scary Mommy headline that read “‘Default Parent...
“There is a big difference between assigning complex texts and teaching complex texts…” —Doug, Fisher, Nancy Frey, and Diane Lapp Your Work Matters In February, I discussed ideas about being intentional with the questions we ask when analyzing our data. In that newsletter, I shared my dismay at the plan to “find more passages.” And what is our instructional response? We find more passages that have the standards-aligned questions students “need to practice” or we start doing an article a day...