|
A note: This is newsletter 3 of a 3-part series! Read the part one here and part two here. Your Work MattersTime is the hottest commodity we have in education. We are constantly trying to figure out how to get more of it. We talk about how to decrease bathroom breaks, how to minimize transitions, how to squeeze in the minimum number of minutes for recess, etc. These are worthy efforts. We only get to work with our students for approximately 180 days per year, with about 5-6 hours of instructional time. When so many schools are pressured to make gains that require more than a year’s worth of growth, we have to squeeze instruction into every precious second. (That’s if we aren’t battling a chronic absenteeism problem, which has decreased but not to pre-pandemic rates - read more here). If you’ve been in the Science of Reading world for a minute, you’ve probably heard of Anita Archer and her Archerisms (shown above). Archer is the co-author of Explicit Instruction: Effective and Efficient Teaching, which highlights HOW we can teach the content many of us are learning in our Science of Reading journey. In Archer’s and Hughes’ book (2011, p. 7) , the authors share 8 Ways of Optimizing Instructional Time:
Those in bold are examples of how important it is to consider how we are using our daily schedules. With those considerations in place, how can we maximize instructional time during the time we have? In addition to these, let’s focus on what we are doing DURING instructional time rather than only how to create more of it. Last month, I alluded to this month's focus on explicit instruction, explaining that: it behooves us to incorporate what cognitive load theory tells us about our instructional design. When learning new information, research supports that direct, explicit instruction is more effective for "novices" than partial guidance. (Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation, 2017). When we think about who sits in our classrooms and the information we present, it is true that many of our learners are in the novice category. They don't yet have the knowledge needed for partial guidance or discovery learning practices. As someone who learned about constructivist theory and taught using a balanced literacy workshop model I understand the allure. We want children to have time for creativity, questions and discovery. And is it effective? Research says no. You may be familiar with the "I do, we do, you do" approach to explicit instruction. This is a very simplified version of how to approach instruction in this manner. And yes, it applies, but there is more to it.
Archer and Hughes (2011, p. 2) list sixteen elements of explicit instruction (more than 3):
You might read this list and think, "I (or my teachers) do all of these things." Yes, AND how? Let's set the scene. You visit a classroom and the teacher begins the lesson. "T - Who remembers what we did yesterday during [insert subject area]? Ss - no response. T - No one remembers? It had something to do with [insert clue]. 1 S - calls out something unrelated. T - Remember? We did [explains the activities in the lesson the day prior]. Ss - more guesses (none are correct)." And at this point, 5 minutes have passed. Were we attempting to "do" number 6, review prior skills and knowledge before beginning instruction? Yes. Was it effective and efficient? No. What if the teacher simply started the lesson with "Yesterday we learned [insert skill] when we [insert activity or clue]." and then continued to verify that students have the prerequisite skill for today's lesson? This approach maximizes the time the teacher has. So while this list of 16 elements may be familiar, the way we do them matters. With an entire book (and other entire books) dedicated to this topic it's hard to expand each of these in a newsletter. But I want to highlight some important considerations as we support teachers in this work.
What we are teaching matters, but so does HOW we teach it. If you haven't started working on this, it's time to begin. Leadership Moves:
What does this mean for me?Maximizing instructional time requires multiple parts of the system to work together. We need leaders to provide the instructional time needed for our content areas in our schedules. We need access to planning time and supports for thinking through the design of our lessons. We need time to rehearse; if this isn't taking place before going live with students, we need room for the SNL version where Keenan can't stop laughing to be ok then try again tomorrow. Use Anna Gillingham's words to guide you: "Go as fast as you can, but as slow as you must." Recommended Resources
Related Newsletters:
Where have we been?Let's Work Together!At Linda Rhyne Consulting, we help schools and districts strengthen their instructional coaching and literacy systems so every educator thrives so they can impact student outcomes. From assessing your current approach, to designing strategic plans, to partnering with leaders for long-term implementation, we make sure your systems align with research, state standards, and your unique context. If you’re ready for cohesive, sustainable systems that work for your people, let’s talk. I'd love the chance to work with you/your team. Book a call today and let’s start designing the support your team deserves. Are you an individual or small team in need of on-demand support? Now, you can schedule a 90-minute session with me based on your needs at exactly the time you need it. The types of sessions are listed below.
For 90 minutes, we will meet and discuss your specific needs based on the information you provide when booking the appointment. The price is $250, paid upon booking the session (special pricing and booking link provided for current/former clients - check your email). Feel free to bring your team! Let's get your needs met at a time that serves you. Click here to bookmark the link or schedule a session.
| Where can we connect?Bold font shows events at which I'm presenting. NC CEC 40th Annual Conference | Learn more here 55th Annual North Carolina Reading Conference | Learn more here IMA Biennial Conference 2026 | Learn more here 2026 PaTTAN Literacy Symposium | Learn more here Get Engaged Coaching & Leadership Con 2026 | Learn more here
Would you like me to join an upcoming event as a speaker? Please reply to this email to inquire about how I can support you and your event.
|
I'm glad you're here. The only way to grow a revolution is by expanding our reach. And we cannot leave the reading revolution to chance. Our children need us.
“For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.”- H. L. Mencken Your work matters. Across the nation, states have passed legislation that requires teacher training and high quality instructional materials, often from a list. In last month’s newsletter, I highlighted the knowing-doing gap in response to this legislation. It’s clear that we need more than increased teacher knowledge and access to curriculum that aligns with the Science of Reading: Excel in Ed’s...
“It is not enough to have knowledge; one must apply it. It is not enough to have wishes; one must also accomplish them.” - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe Your work matters. A saying that we lean on in the Science of Reading movement is "know better, do better" a shortened version of Maya Angelou's “Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better.” And yes, for many educators this accurately describes an important step in their SoR journey: building knowledge about...
A note from Linda: I am seeking to meet with leaders for feedback on The Coaching System Growth Model, a transformative plan for improving coaching systems I’ve developed. If you’d like to participate, please reply or schedule a time here. “The expert at anything was once a beginner.” - Helen Hayes Your work matters. Last month, I finally met David and Meredith Liben in person after knowing them for years. I’ve been lucky to work with them on their Improving Reading for Older Students course...