|
A note: This is newsletter 3 of a 3-part series! Read the part one here and part two here. Your Work MattersTime is the hottest commodity we have in education. We are constantly trying to figure out how to get more of it. We talk about how to decrease bathroom breaks, how to minimize transitions, how to squeeze in the minimum number of minutes for recess, etc. These are worthy efforts. We only get to work with our students for approximately 180 days per year, with about 5-6 hours of instructional time. When so many schools are pressured to make gains that require more than a year’s worth of growth, we have to squeeze instruction into every precious second. (That’s if we aren’t battling a chronic absenteeism problem, which has decreased but not to pre-pandemic rates - read more here). If you’ve been in the Science of Reading world for a minute, you’ve probably heard of Anita Archer and her Archerisms (shown above). Archer is the co-author of Explicit Instruction: Effective and Efficient Teaching, which highlights HOW we can teach the content many of us are learning in our Science of Reading journey. In Archer’s and Hughes’ book (2011, p. 7) , the authors share 8 Ways of Optimizing Instructional Time:
Those in bold are examples of how important it is to consider how we are using our daily schedules. With those considerations in place, how can we maximize instructional time during the time we have? In addition to these, let’s focus on what we are doing DURING instructional time rather than only how to create more of it. Last month, I alluded to this month's focus on explicit instruction, explaining that: it behooves us to incorporate what cognitive load theory tells us about our instructional design. When learning new information, research supports that direct, explicit instruction is more effective for "novices" than partial guidance. (Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation, 2017). When we think about who sits in our classrooms and the information we present, it is true that many of our learners are in the novice category. They don't yet have the knowledge needed for partial guidance or discovery learning practices. As someone who learned about constructivist theory and taught using a balanced literacy workshop model I understand the allure. We want children to have time for creativity, questions and discovery. And is it effective? Research says no. You may be familiar with the "I do, we do, you do" approach to explicit instruction. This is a very simplified version of how to approach instruction in this manner. And yes, it applies, but there is more to it.
Archer and Hughes (2011, p. 2) list sixteen elements of explicit instruction (more than 3):
You might read this list and think, "I (or my teachers) do all of these things." Yes, AND how? Let's set the scene. You visit a classroom and the teacher begins the lesson. "T - Who remembers what we did yesterday during [insert subject area]? Ss - no response. T - No one remembers? It had something to do with [insert clue]. 1 S - calls out something unrelated. T - Remember? We did [explains the activities in the lesson the day prior]. Ss - more guesses (none are correct)." And at this point, 5 minutes have passed. Were we attempting to "do" number 6, review prior skills and knowledge before beginning instruction? Yes. Was it effective and efficient? No. What if the teacher simply started the lesson with "Yesterday we learned [insert skill] when we [insert activity or clue]." and then continued to verify that students have the prerequisite skill for today's lesson? This approach maximizes the time the teacher has. So while this list of 16 elements may be familiar, the way we do them matters. With an entire book (and other entire books) dedicated to this topic it's hard to expand each of these in a newsletter. But I want to highlight some important considerations as we support teachers in this work.
What we are teaching matters, but so does HOW we teach it. If you haven't started working on this, it's time to begin. Leadership Moves:
What does this mean for me?Maximizing instructional time requires multiple parts of the system to work together. We need leaders to provide the instructional time needed for our content areas in our schedules. We need access to planning time and supports for thinking through the design of our lessons. We need time to rehearse; if this isn't taking place before going live with students, we need room for the SNL version where Keenan can't stop laughing to be ok then try again tomorrow. Use Anna Gillingham's words to guide you: "Go as fast as you can, but as slow as you must." Recommended Resources
Related Newsletters:
Where have we been?Let's Work Together!At Linda Rhyne Consulting, we help schools and districts strengthen their instructional coaching and literacy systems so every educator thrives so they can impact student outcomes. From assessing your current approach, to designing strategic plans, to partnering with leaders for long-term implementation, we make sure your systems align with research, state standards, and your unique context. If you’re ready for cohesive, sustainable systems that work for your people, let’s talk. I'd love the chance to work with you/your team. Book a call today and let’s start designing the support your team deserves. Are you an individual or small team in need of on-demand support? Now, you can schedule a 90-minute session with me based on your needs at exactly the time you need it. The types of sessions are listed below.
For 90 minutes, we will meet and discuss your specific needs based on the information you provide when booking the appointment. The price is $250, paid upon booking the session (special pricing and booking link provided for current/former clients - check your email). Feel free to bring your team! Let's get your needs met at a time that serves you. Click here to bookmark the link or schedule a session.
| Where can we connect?Bold font shows events at which I'm presenting. I don't have any upcoming events taking place but I'll keep you posted on what's next!
Would you like me to join an upcoming event? Please reply to this email and let's plan something!
|
I'm glad you're here. The only way to grow a revolution is by expanding our reach. And we cannot leave the reading revolution to chance. Our children need us.
Well friends, it finally happened. I'm late on a newsletter! But, now you know a real human writes this thing each month. Enjoy! A note: This is newsletter 2 of a 3-part series! Read the first one here. "I've come to the conclusion Sweller's Cognitive Load Theory is the single most important thing for teachers to know." - Dylan William Your Work Matters “Cognitive load refers to the amount of information our working memory can process at any given time. For educational purposes, CLT helps us...
A note: Writing this newsletter inspired me to write more on this topic, so it will be a 3 part series. More to come! "You can do two things at once, but you can't focus effectively on two things at once." - Gary Keller Your Work Matters In my experience, schools typically have multiple improvement goals focused on multiple content areas and or aspects of the work of school (i.e. behaviors). And as a former member of my child’s School Improvement Team, it was the same - multiple goals focused...
“Any new initiative must be contextualized so it fits with the unique needs and resources of the existing system.” - Brown & Stollar (MTSS for Reading Improvement, 2025) Your Work Matters Education systems are complex. While we lean on evidence to guide our decisions and look to examples where things are going “right”, we must also consider the factors that make our schools and districts unique. What at first seems like objective indicators requires a subjective lens; we can't ignore how some...